[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Apple OS X Yosemite
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook

Other products from Apple

Apple Remote Desktop28Apple OS X Mavericks28
Claim profile →

AEO Score

33

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

42

across 28 prompts

AI Share of Voice

55%

across 12 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
1 brand-level
Cited100%1/1
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
12 brand-level
Cited75%9/12
Share of voice64%avg
Engine consensus67%of engines
Competitors2.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
8 brand-level
Cited88%7/8
Share of voice58%avg
Engine consensus42%of engines
Competitors2.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited71%5/7
Share of voice48%avg
Engine consensus58%of engines
Competitors4.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Executive summary

AI engines are very likely to cite apple.com for consumer-facing and general tech queries, but it is unlikely to be cited as a B2B software/SaaS evaluation source (e.g., “best [category] software” or “Apple vs competitor” for business tools). The single highest-ROI fix for B2B-style citation would be to publish crawlable, evaluation-intent pages (clear “what it is / who it’s for / pricing” for business offerings) with structured Q&A and SoftwareApplication-style structured data—right now the domain is not behaving like a B2B SaaS listing site.

Based on audit of apple.com · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy