Async video messaging that replaces meetings and long email threads
Executive summary
Loom is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (G2: 2342 reviews, 4.7★, Leader) and it publishes first-party comparison content (e.g., Loom vs Vidyard) plus a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit tiers. The biggest remaining citation risk is structured-data/technical AEO gaps (no detectable SoftwareApplication/FAQPage schema in live crawl signals) and incomplete coverage for some competitor-specific comparison prompts (notably ScreenPal, Zight, and Camtasia in the exact “Loom compare to X” format).
Based on audit of loom.com · Apr 1, 2026
Avg Prompt Score
57
across 20 prompts
Category Rank
#12
of 22 brands
vs. Category Avg
0
avg 63/100
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Content · score distribution
22 brands63/100 · #12 of 22 · at category avg · median 66
Pillar scores vs. category average
Vertical line = category average (22 brands)