[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/ActivTrak
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

12

across 347 prompts

AI Share of Voice

12%

across 347 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
212 category
Cited13%27/212
Share of voice12%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors0.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories ActivTrak is visible in

2
  • Device Managementnot yet measured→
  • Performance Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

ActivTrak is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has substantial third-party review presence (G2: 333 reviews, 4.3/5; TrustRadius: 309 reviews, 8.5/10) and publicly crawlable pricing with explicit tiers ($0/$10/$15/$19 per user/month). The highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party evaluation surfaces for AI (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data and additional indexed comparison/evaluation pages), because those are what enable AI engines to cite the brand directly for “vs/alternatives/pricing” prompts rather than relying on G2/TrustRadius.

Based on audit of activtrak.com · Jun 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy