[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Happyfox
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

71

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

26

across 464 prompts

AI Share of Voice

25%

across 446 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
421 category
Cited23%98/421
Share of voice21%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors5.1avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
12 brand-level
Cited75%9/12
Share of voice75%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited80%4/5
Share of voice80%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited50%2/4
Share of voice50%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Happyfox is visible in

3
  • Customer Service & Support38 of 115→
  • Feedback Managementnot yet measured→
  • Knowledge Basenot yet measured→

Executive summary

HappyFox is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage help desk queries because it has strong G2 presence (137 reviews, 4.5★) and first-party comparison content like “HappyFox vs Zendesk” plus publicly crawlable pricing (starting at $99/agent/mo). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating) and ensure it’s consistently present across key evaluation pages, so AI engines can confidently answer “How does HappyFox compare to Zendesk?” and “How much does HappyFox cost?” with first-party citations.

Based on audit of happyfox.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy