[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/OpenText Content Management
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

62

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

12

across 395 prompts

AI Share of Voice

10%

across 377 prompts

Critical Issues

6

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
371 category
Cited9%34/371
Share of voice9%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
11 brand-level
Cited82%9/11
Share of voice82%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors0.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited75%3/4
Share of voice75%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited20%1/5
Share of voice20%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories OpenText Content Management is visible in

3
  • Document Collaboration52 of 154→
  • Developer Toolsnot yet measured→
  • Digital Asset Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

OpenText is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has first-party comparison content for at least one core competitor (e.g., “OpenText Content Cloud vs Box”) and strong G2 presence. The biggest AI-citation risk is that pricing and structured evaluation content (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) are not clearly discoverable/crawlable from the signals we checked, which can suppress citation for “How much does OpenText cost?” and “best alternatives” shortlists.

Based on audit of opentext.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy