[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Typora
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

11

across 149 prompts

AI Share of Voice

11%

across 149 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Shortlist Position

0/80

Not Visible · Document Collaboration Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
78 category
Cited5%4/78
Share of voice5%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Typora is visible in

1
  • Document Collaborationnot yet measured→

Your visibility gap

Typora surfaces in 0/80 Document Collaboration discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.

Claim Typora →

Executive summary

Typora is likely cited for “best text editor software” and markdown-writing intent via its first-party product/pricing pages and active support content, but it is weak for AI evaluation-style queries that require structured, crawlable comparison and pricing evidence. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish first-party, crawlable evaluation content that directly targets the buyer query patterns (especially “How does Typora compare to Visual Studio Code?” and “What are the best alternatives to Typora?”) with clear, self-contained answer blocks.

Based on audit of typora.io · May 29, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy