Subcategory · AI Citation Index
Applicant Tracking
Greenhouse and Lever tie at ~65% shortlist rate; Workday climbs +15 pts while 267 brands fragment the ATS landscape.
180 discovery queries · 304 head-to-heads · refreshed Jul 25, 2026
Discovery stage
The shortlist
Across 180 buyer-style "Applicant Tracking" queries
Greenhouse (65.0% shortlist rate, 506 mentions) and Lever (64.4%, 474 mentions) dominate AI recommendations across 180 prompts. Workday appears twice in the top-ten (111 and 85 shortlist appearances), Ashbyhq claims 56.1%, and the long tail—267 total brands—signals category fragmentation. Model diversity hits 4 for all top brands.
Hover or click a logo to see brand details
Get weekly AI visibility changes for Applicant Tracking sent to your inbox.
Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.
Signal by intent
By topic
Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.
Evaluation stage
Head-to-head
How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 7/100
Greenhouse, Lever, and BambooHR share the highest average evaluation score of 48 across head-to-head queries. iCIMS and Ashby trail by one point at 47, while Workday and SmartRecruiters score 45. The median average across all evaluated brands sits at just 7, exposing a steep drop-off beyond the top eight.
Hover or click a logo to see brand details
Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.
Brands to know
In this category
Workday
Scores 78 and climbed +15 points, the strongest upward move in the category. Enterprise HRIS incumbency translates to ATS mindshare, though dual domain entries in shortlist data hint at structural ambiguity.
Read brand profile →Lever
Ties Greenhouse in shortlist rate (64.4%) and evaluation score (48), with 474 mentions. Modern interface and recruiter workflow tooling keep it in every AI recommendation set.
Read brand profile →Greenhouse
Leads shortlist appearances (117 of 180 prompts) and mention volume (506). Scores 62 overall but matches Lever at 48 in direct comparisons, cementing dual-leader status.
Read brand profile →Ashbyhq
56.1% shortlist rate and evaluation score of 47 position it as the emerging challenger. Analytics-first positioning resonates in multi-model consensus despite lower total mentions (288).
Read brand profile →Workable
Scores 72—second highest in featured candidates—yet shortlist rate drops to 47.2% and evaluation score to 43. SMB focus and international presence drive divergent AI treatment.
Read brand profile →Citation sources
Where AI pulls citations from
654 citations captured across Applicant Tracking prompt runs.
Vendor pages
190Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors
Independent sources
186Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned
Buyer questions
What AI cites for top Applicant Tracking questions
Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.
Discovery
Buyers exploring the category- Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) in 2026: Compared & Ranked | Frankland Automationfranklandautomation.com
- Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) in 2026: Compared & Rankedtheundercoverrecruiter.com
- 10 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) of 2026 - People Managing Peoplepeoplemanagingpeople.com
Evaluation
Buyers comparing options- 24 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS): Full Comparison 2026selectsoftwarereviews.com
- top-ats-software-integrationshrmless.com
Want to know if AI cites your brand for Applicant Tracking?
Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.
Run an audit →