[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Alexandria
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

7

across 320 prompts

AI Share of Voice

7%

across 320 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
184 brand-level
Cited0%0/184
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
7 brand-level
Cited100%7/7
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited100%7/7
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Alexandria is visible in

2
  • OKRsnot yet measured→
  • Project Management Softwarenot yet measured→

Executive summary

goalexandria.com is a B2B library automation software brand, but it is unlikely to be cited reliably for evaluation-stage queries like “best library automation software” and “goalexandria pricing” because first-party evaluation assets (notably SoftwareApplication/FAQPage-style structured content and crawlable pricing/comparison pages) are not clearly discoverable via search. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish/ensure crawlable, SSR-rendered evaluation pages (pricing + [Alexandria] vs key competitors) with SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema so AI engines can quote and recommend it.

Based on audit of goalexandria.com · May 15, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy