[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Drip
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

34

across 917 prompts

AI Share of Voice

34%

across 899 prompts

Category Visibility

#17

in Marketing Automation · of 106

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
623 category
Cited45%278/623
Share of voice39%avg
Engine consensus45%of engines
Competitors5.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
12 brand-level
Cited83%10/12
Share of voice83%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
8 brand-level
Cited75%6/8
Share of voice75%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited71%5/7
Share of voice71%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Drip is visible in

3
  • Email Marketing16 of 60→
  • Marketing Automation17 of 106→
  • Marketing40 of 235→

Executive summary

Drip is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 authority (473 reviews, 4.4★) and first-party comparison pages for key rivals like Klaviyo and ActiveCampaign. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen AI-citable structured evaluation content (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and ensure technical crawlability for pricing and comparison pages so prompts like “How much does Drip cost?” and “How does Drip compare to Klaviyo?” can be answered directly from drip.com rather than only from third parties.

Based on audit of drip.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy