[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/JumpCloud
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

27

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

54

across 515 prompts

AI Share of Voice

54%

across 515 prompts

Category Visibility

#12

in Identity & Access Management · of 83

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
337 category
Cited60%202/337
Share of voice52%avg
Engine consensus44%of engines
Competitors6.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors4.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories JumpCloud is visible in

2
  • Identity & Access Management12 of 83→
  • Device Management15 of 96→

Executive summary

JumpCloud is strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation-stage queries because it has high-volume G2 presence (3,944 reviews shown on G2) and first-party comparison pages like “JumpCloud vs Okta” and “JumpCloud vs NinjaOne.” The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand crawlable, schema-backed evaluation content for pricing and “worth it” style prompts (e.g., FAQPage + SoftwareApplication/Offer/price structured data) so models can cite JumpCloud directly for conversion queries like “How much does JumpCloud cost?”

Based on audit of jumpcloud.com · Jun 3, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy