Subcategory · AI Citation Index

AI Coding

The AI coding category exhibits robust market agreement with 25 consensus brands, yet evaluation coverage remains shallow at just 12 brands and 0% prompt-based testing. Cursor dominates shortlist consideration at 79%, followed by a competitive mid-tier (Default at 66%, Tabnine at 63%) and established platforms (JetBrains, GitLab both at 53%). Universal 4-model diversity across top brands suggests evaluators are testing tools against varied LLM backends rather than assessing standalone capabilities, indicating the category may be fragmenting into infrastructure plays versus interface innovations.

160 discovery queries · 220 head-to-heads · refreshed Jul 13, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 160 buyer-style "AI Coding" queries

0%16%32%48%64%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces57%64%71%79%86%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for AI Coding sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Cursor
15/15
2Default
15/15
3GitLab
14/15
4Tabnine
12/15
5Windsurf
12/15
1Cursor
14/14
2Default
14/14
3Windsurf
13/14
4JetBrains AI Assistant
11/14
5Tabnine
10/14
1Cursor
12/12
2Default
11/12
3Windsurf
10/12
4Claude Code
7/12
5JetBrains AI Assistant
7/12
1Cursor
10/10
2Tabnine
10/10
3Claude Code
9/10
4Replit
9/10
5Default
9/10
1Cursor
9/9
2Claude Code
9/9
3Windsurf
9/9
4Default
9/9
5Tabnine
8/9
1Default
9/9
2Cursor
9/9
3Tabnine
9/9
4Claude Code
8/9
5Internal
8/9
1Tabnine
9/9
2Claude Code
9/9
3Cursor
9/9
4Gemini Code Assist
8/9
5GitLab
8/9
1Cursor
6/6
2Codeium
5/6
3Default
5/6
4GitLab
4/6
5Tabnine
2/6
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · ai-coding

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 7/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand06121824Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 7/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

1000 citations captured across AI Coding prompt runs.

Vendor pages

436

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

396

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top AI Coding questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for AI Coding?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full AI Coding leaderboard →