Subcategory · AI Citation Index

GRC Platforms

ServiceNow GRC, Vanta, and Drata split shortlist dominance; only 3 months of trend data show high volatility and ServiceNow rising 13 points.

170 discovery queries · 429 head-to-heads · refreshed Jun 3, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 170 buyer-style "GRC Platforms" queries

ServiceNow GRC leads by raw shortlist rate (61.76%), appearing in 105 of 170 prompts with 246 mentions across four models. Vanta and Drata tie at 58.24% shortlist rates (99 prompts each), though Drata edges ahead on total mentions (262 vs. 270). LogicGate, AuditBoard, and MetricStream round out the consensus tier, each clearing 54% shortlist rates with broad model coverage.

6%14%22%30%39%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces68%73%78%83%88%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for GRC Platforms sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1LogicGate
9/9
2StandardFusion
9/9
3Vanta
9/9
4Drata
9/9
5AuditBoard
9/9
1LogicGate
7/7
2LogicManager
7/7
3Vanta
7/7
4ServiceNow
7/7
5Drata
7/7
1Vanta
5/5
2Drata
5/5
3Sprinto
5/5
4Secureframe
5/5
5Default
5/5
1Drata
5/5
2Vanta
5/5
3Secureframe
5/5
4ServiceNow GRC
4/5
5POINT
3/5
1Vanta
5/5
2Drata
5/5
3Secureframe
5/5
4ServiceNow GRC
4/5
5Sprinto
4/5
1Drata
5/5
2Vanta
5/5
3LogicGate
5/5
4ServiceNow GRC
5/5
5ServiceNow
5/5
1Drata
5/5
2Vanta
5/5
3LogicGate
5/5
4AuditBoard
5/5
5Diligent
5/5
1ServiceNow GRC
5/5
2ServiceNow
5/5
3MetricStream
5/5
4IBM Datacap
5/5
5RSA Archer
5/5
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · grc-platforms

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 10/100

Head-to-head queries yield a flat distribution: Archer, ServiceNow GRC, Drata, and AuditBoard all average 57/100 across 38 comparisons, while Vanta, LogicGate, and MetricStream score 55 across 37. RSA Archer lags at 54 despite strong shortlist presence. The narrow 3-point spread (54–57) and low median (10) suggest models struggle to differentiate GRC platforms in direct evaluation contexts.

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand010192938Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 10/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

947 citations captured across GRC Platforms prompt runs.

Vendor pages

471

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

284

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top GRC Platforms questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for GRC Platforms?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full GRC Platforms leaderboard →