Category · AI Citation Index

Risk, Compliance & GRC

GRC is a fragmented category with no consensus pick. ServiceNow captures the widest share of AI attention — surfacing in 77% of buyer queries across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity — but loses almost every head-to-head comparison it enters. Vanta and Secureframe each show up in fewer than half the discovery prompts ServiceNow does, yet both win more head-to-heads than they lose. LogicGate, MetricStream, RSA Archer, and Diligent form a second tier of discovery visibility (all above 60% shortlist rate, all visible on every engine), but none have sufficient comparison-query volume to assess head-to-head performance. This is a contested category: wide discovery spread, evaluation outcomes that contradict discovery rank, and five subcategories (compliance automation, privacy, third-party risk, audit, ESG) each pulling buyer attention in different directions.

240 discovery queries · 107 head-to-heads · refreshed May 1, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 240 buyer-style "Risk, Compliance & GRC" queries

ServiceNow shows up in 77% of buyer queries about GRC software and surfaces across all four engines. LogicGate and MetricStream each appear in roughly 70% of queries, also visible on every engine. Vanta and Drata — both compliance-automation brands — land in 68% to 70% of discovery prompts, while RSA Archer and Diligent hold the 60%-65% band. Secureframe captures only 46% of discovery queries despite four-engine visibility, leaving it underexposed relative to the top tier.

3%8%12%17%22%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces69%73%77%81%85%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Risk, Compliance & GRC sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Comprehensive
33/39
2MetricStream
28/39
3ServiceNow GRC
27/39
4ServiceNow
26/39
5LogicGate
25/39
1Comprehensive
34/35
2ServiceNow GRC
34/35
3Archer
33/35
4MetricStream
33/35
5ServiceNow
33/35
1Vanta
12/14
2Drata
12/14
3LogicGate
11/14
4AuditBoard
11/14
5MetricStream
11/14
1ServiceNow
9/13
2MetricStream
9/13
3ServiceNow GRC
8/13
4Diligent
8/13
5Drata
8/13
1RSA Archer
10/12
2MetricStream
10/12
3ServiceNow GRC
10/12
4ServiceNow
9/12
5LogicGate
9/12
1Vanta
11/11
2Drata
11/11
3Secureframe
11/11
4Hyperproof
9/11
5Trust
8/11
1Comprehensive
8/9
2ServiceNow
8/9
3LogicGate
7/9
4ServiceNow GRC
7/9
5MetricStream
6/9
1ServiceNow GRC
8/8
2ServiceNow
8/8
3Diligent
8/8
4MetricStream
7/8
5RSA Archer
7/8
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · risk-compliance-grc

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 56/100

Proofpoint Cloud App Security Broker wins the most head-to-heads in this category, averaging a 63 score across ten comparison queries. Vanta and Secureframe each score 60 and 56 respectively, both winning more matchups than they lose. ServiceNow and Drata — despite high discovery share — score zero in head-to-head comparisons, losing to rivals when buyers ask AI to pick between specific options. Imanage appears in 45 comparison queries but scores just 14, losing nearly every matchup it enters.

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand011233445Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 56/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

1000 citations captured across Risk, Compliance & GRC prompt runs.

Vendor pages

297

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

204

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Risk, Compliance & GRC questions

Most queries here are top-of-funnel exploration — buyers ask AI for the best GRC tools by company stage, compliance need, or vertical ('compliance software for seed-funded companies', 'GRC platforms for small business compliance needs', 'tools for continuous compliance monitoring'). A smaller slice digs into decision-making ('which type of risk management software is right for my organization', 'how to determine the right compliance tool for my specific needs'). Trust and pricing questions are sparse, typically focused on SOC 2 compliance status, user satisfaction scores, and hidden costs in GRC platforms.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Trust

Buyers checking credibility

Drill down

Subcategories

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Risk, Compliance & GRC?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Risk, Compliance & GRC leaderboard →