Subcategory · AI Citation Index
Who AI is citing in Scheduling & Calendar
Calendly is the only brand with measurable head-to-head data in scheduling, winning more comparisons than it loses across eight AI matchups.
5 brands tracked · refreshed Apr 28, 2026
Brands to know
In this category
Calendly
Link-based meeting scheduler for external bookings
Read brand profile →Cal.com
Open-source scheduling with self-hosting option
Read brand profile →Motion
AI calendar optimizer for time blocking
Read brand profile →Reclaim
Automatic calendar defense and habit scheduling
Read brand profile →Doodle
Polling-based group availability finder
Read brand profile →FAQ
Scheduling & Calendar questions, answered
How does Calendly perform in head-to-head AI comparisons?
Calendly wins more head-to-heads than it loses across eight comparison queries, landing at a 72-out-of-100 average. That sits exactly at the category median, meaning it holds its own in AI-driven matchups but does not dominate every fight.
Are any scheduling brands gaining or losing AI visibility over time?
The audit has two months of data — March and April 2026 — with only a handful of runs in each. No brand shows a clear upward or downward trend yet; the delta between months is noise, not signal.
Why is there so little evaluation and comparison data for scheduling tools?
All 35 prompts in the audit are discovery-stage queries asking AI to suggest tools for specific workflows. Zero prompts ask 'X versus Y' or dive into pricing, integrations, or trust signals, so the audit has no evaluation data beyond Calendly's eight head-to-heads.
Want to know if AI cites your brand for Scheduling & Calendar?
Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.
Run an audit →