AI Visibility
measured38/100
Emerging · in Task Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
9
across 1050 prompts
AI Share of Voice
9%
across 1050 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Task Management
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Airtable is highly likely to be cited for evaluation and conversion queries because it has first-party comparison pages (e.g., Airtable vs Asana) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit per-seat pricing ($20/user/month Team; $45/user/month Business when billed annually). The biggest AI-citation risk is structured-data/technical AEO gaps (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating not confirmed) plus missing/unclear llms.txt and potential secondary review/analyst coverage gaps beyond G2.
Based on audit of airtable.com · May 5, 2026