Subcategory · AI Citation Index

3D & CAD

The 3D & CAD category exhibits remarkably uniform engagement patterns, with shortlist rates clustering tightly between 19-25% and every top brand scoring identical model diversity (4). This consistency suggests a mature market where buyers systematically compare multiple specialized solutions rather than gravitating toward dominant platforms. The presence of both industry giants (SOLIDWORKS, Autodesk) alongside niche players (cadgulf.com, conceptltd.com) at similar shortlist rates indicates fragmentation by use case—whether mechanical design, AR development, rendering, or PCB layout—rather than consolidation around general-purpose tools.

177 discovery queries · 222 head-to-heads · refreshed Jun 15, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 177 buyer-style "3D & CAD" queries

3%6%9%12%15%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces67%75%83%91%99%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for 3D & CAD sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Concept
4/8
2KeyShot
4/8
3Adobe
3/8
4STAGE
3/8
5SOLIDWORKS Visualize
3/8
1Twinmotion
7/8
2STAGE
6/8
3SketchUp
4/8
4Concept
4/8
5Output
4/8
1Autodesk Construction Cloud
7/7
2SolidWorks PDM
6/7
3Autodesk Vault
5/7
4ENOVIA
3/7
5Bluebeam Revu
1/7
1SolidWorks Simulation
4/5
2Shapes
3/5
3Abaqus
3/5
4Ansys Mechanical
3/5
5Onshape
3/5
1Onshape
5/5
2SolidWorks PDM
4/5
3Concept
4/5
4Blender
4/5
5Autodesk Vault
3/5
1Tinkercad
2/4
2FreeCAD
1/4
3AutoCAD
1/4
4ZBrush
1/4
5Ultimaker Cura
1/4
1FreeCAD
2/3
2Altair HyperWorks
2/3
3SolidWorks PDM
2/3
4Ansys Mechanical
2/3
5Abaqus
2/3
1FreeCAD
3/3
2Autodesk Alias
1/3
3Autodesk Vault
1/3
4SolidWorks PDM
1/3
5Tinkercad
1/3
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · 3d-cad

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 6/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand07142027Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 6/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

638 citations captured across 3D & CAD prompt runs.

Vendor pages

158

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

139

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top 3D & CAD questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for 3D & CAD?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full 3D & CAD leaderboard →