Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Construction Software

Construction software shows clear market leadership with Procore (56%) and Autodesk Construction Cloud (53%) capturing majority shortlist consideration, both achieving maximum model diversity (4) indicating consistent cross-evaluator recognition. Built (50%) and Buildertrend (46%) form a strong second tier, while legacy enterprise players like Sage (37%) and field-focused tools like Fieldwire (34%) serve distinct niches. The 65-brand consensus pool against only 12 evaluation brands suggests buyers face overwhelming choice in a category where project management, BIM, and field operations remain fragmented across multiple point solutions rather than consolidated platforms.

149 discovery queries · 209 head-to-heads · refreshed Jul 13, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 149 buyer-style "Construction Software" queries

0%12%24%36%49%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces44%55%67%78%90%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Construction Software sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Procore
5/5
2Autodesk Construction Cloud
5/5
3Focused
5/5
4Built
5/5
5Place
5/5
1Procore
4/4
2Autodesk Construction Cloud
4/4
3Buildertrend
4/4
4Built
3/4
5CoConstruct
3/4
1Procore
4/4
2Autodesk Construction Cloud
4/4
3Built
4/4
4Buildertrend
3/4
5Crew
3/4
1Sage
3/3
2Built
3/3
3Procore
3/3
4Confirm
3/3
5Knowify
2/3
1Procore
3/3
2Fieldwire
3/3
3PlanGrid
3/3
4Raken
3/3
5Buildertrend
3/3
1Procore
3/3
2Foundation Software
3/3
3Fieldwire
3/3
4Autodesk Construction Cloud
3/3
5Sage
3/3
1Focused
3/3
2Built
3/3
3Procore
3/3
4Sage
3/3
5Buildertrend
3/3
1Focused
3/3
2Procore
3/3
3Autodesk Construction Cloud
3/3
4Oracle
3/3
5CMiC
3/3
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · construction-software

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 6/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand06121824Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 6/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

622 citations captured across Construction Software prompt runs.

Vendor pages

233

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

150

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Construction Software questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Construction Software?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Construction Software leaderboard →