Category · AI Citation Index

Vertical SaaS

Vertical SaaS shortlists are fragmented across 391 brands; builtforteams.com leads at 85% shortlist rate, Procore and Toast follow in construction and hospitality.

620 discovery queries · 105 head-to-heads · refreshed May 6, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 620 buyer-style "Vertical SaaS" queries

builtforteams.com appears in 204 of 240 prompts (85% shortlist rate) but lacks citation-quality data—a pattern that suggests LLM fallback mentions rather than substantive evaluations. Procore (50% shortlist rate, 275 mentions) and Toast (43%, 217 mentions) anchor construction and restaurant verticals with consistent multi-model presence. ServiceTitan, Clio, and practice.do each hold ~40–48% shortlist rates, indicating vertical lockdown in home services, legal, and coaching/wellness niches.

1%7%14%20%26%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces67%74%81%88%95%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Vertical SaaS sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Built
16/17
2Comprehensive
15/17
3Focused
13/17
4Open
11/17
5Effort
10/17
1Built
12/15
2Recommend
12/15
3POINT
9/15
4Insights
8/15
5Comprehensive
8/15
1Built
7/12
2Comprehensive
6/12
3Practice
5/12
4Procore
5/12
5Structured
5/12
1Built
10/10
2Procore
9/10
3Clio
7/10
4Toast
6/10
5Yardi
6/10
1Comprehensive
10/10
2Practice
9/10
3Focused
8/10
4Built
7/10
5Recommend
6/10
1Comprehensive
8/9
2Built
8/9
3Focused
7/9
4POINT
5/9
5STAGE
5/9
1Built
7/9
2Focused
6/9
3Comprehensive
5/9
4Connect
4/9
5Beyond
4/9
1Built
9/9
2Comprehensive
6/9
3Buildium
6/9
4Focused
6/9
5Recommend
5/9
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · vertical-saas

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 56/100

Clio scores 79 in head-to-head evaluations—the highest in vertical SaaS—across 5 comparison queries, signaling strong AI preference in legal practice management. Opera PMS (Oracle Hospitality) averages 69 over 6 queries, while Toast drops to 64 despite high shortlist visibility. iManage collapses to 14 across 45 queries, the widest evaluation gap in the category, pointing to legacy reputation but weak LLM recommendation strength.

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand011233445Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 56/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

1000 citations captured across Vertical SaaS prompt runs.

Vendor pages

131

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

160

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Vertical SaaS questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Drill down

Subcategories

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Vertical SaaS?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Vertical SaaS leaderboard →