Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Field Service & Workforce

The field service management category reveals a competitive landscape where enterprise CRM giants (Salesforce, Microsoft Dynamics 365) compete directly with purpose-built vertical solutions (ServiceTitan, Jobber, Housecall Pro). All top performers achieve identical model_diversity scores of 4, indicating consistent recognition across different AI models. The near-parity in shortlist rates (43-49%) among the top six brands suggests no single dominant player has emerged, with buyers choosing between broad platform capabilities versus specialized field service features. ServiceNow and ServiceMax round out the top tier at 36%, representing enterprise service management approaches to field operations.

162 discovery queries · 201 head-to-heads · refreshed Jun 15, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 162 buyer-style "Field Service & Workforce" queries

2%11%21%30%39%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces66%74%83%91%100%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Field Service & Workforce sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1GPS
5/6
2Salesforce
5/6
3Jobber
4/6
4Housecall Pro
4/6
5Workiz
4/6
1Jobber
5/5
2Housecall Pro
5/5
3Salesforce
5/5
4Microsoft
5/5
5ServiceTitan
5/5
1Procore
2/4
2ServiceTitan
2/4
3Jobber
2/4
4FieldEdge
2/4
5Salesforce
2/4
1Salesforce
4/4
2Microsoft
4/4
3ServiceMax
3/4
4Jobber
3/4
5ServiceTitan
3/4
1Salesforce
4/4
2Microsoft
4/4
3Infor
4/4
4Netsuite
4/4
5ServiceTitan
3/4
1Salesforce
3/3
2ServiceTitan
3/3
3Jobber
3/3
4Samsara
3/3
5FieldEdge
2/3
1Jobber
3/3
2Housecall Pro
3/3
3ServiceTitan
3/3
4Salesforce
3/3
5Microsoft
3/3
1ServiceTitan
3/3
2Jobber
3/3
3FieldEdge
3/3
4Salesforce
3/3
5Housecall Pro
3/3
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · field-service

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 11/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand05101520Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 11/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

572 citations captured across Field Service & Workforce prompt runs.

Vendor pages

212

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

130

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Field Service & Workforce questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Field Service & Workforce?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Field Service & Workforce leaderboard →