AEO Audit is a free tool that scores B2B SaaS websites for AI search visibility — how likely they are to be cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews when B2B buyers search.

What is AI Engine Optimization (AEO)?

AI Engine Optimization (AEO) is the practice of structuring content, entity signals, and technical infrastructure so that AI engines cite your brand in generated answers. It extends traditional SEO to cover ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews.

Yes. AEO Audit is free. Enter any B2B SaaS brand and receive a full AI visibility score with prioritised recommendations.

How does AEO Audit score websites?

AEO Audit scores across six pillars: AI Visibility (22%), Brand Authority (23%), Content Quality (18%), Platform Optimization (15%), Structured Data (12%), and Technical AEO (10%). Each pillar reflects specific signals that AI engines use when deciding which sources to cite.

Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Who AI is citing in Resource Planning

No brand dominates AI shortlists in resource planning; Oracle Sales Performance Management leads evaluation scores at 63.

Brands tracked

Avg AEO score

55/100

Citation coverage

of brands cited at least once

Dominant brands

cited > 50% of queries

Discovery stage

The shortlist

When buyers ask AI for the best Resource Planning software

No discovery-stage prompts have been scored against this category yet — once the shortlist cron runs, this section will surface which brands AI cites most.

Evaluation stage

The battleground

How brands fare on comparison queries · category median 33/100

Oracle Sales Performance Management scores 63 in head-to-head comparisons, the highest among featured brands. Awork follows at 58, then ScheduleFlex at 52. The median evaluation score sits at 33 across four brands with comparison-query data, meaning half the field performs substantially worse than the leaders. Upland Panviva scored 0 in all four comparison queries.

Oracle Sales Performance Management

31· 4 queries

Upland Panviva

0· 4 queries

Each brand's evaluation score averages how AI responds to head-to-head comparison queries that mention them. Above-median brands win their comparisons more often than they lose.

Trends

Over the last 12 months

Too few audits to establish a trend. Data spans two months (March 2026: 51 avg, April 2026: 55 avg, sample sizes 4 and 9). Awork shows a +6 delta as the only rising brand flagged, but the limited time window and small samples make this directionally interesting, not conclusive.

Biggest gain

Awork

+6 pts

Editorial picks

Brands worth watching

Oracle Sales Performance Management

Scores 63 in evaluations, the highest in the category, yet appears in zero shortlists. AI models cite it only when buyers already know the name and ask for direct comparisons — a pure enterprise incumbent signal.

Read brand profile →

Awork

Holds a 40 average in evaluations and shows a +6 delta as the only rising brand in the limited trend data. Modest traction in a category with no breakout winners.

Read brand profile →

ScheduleFlex

Scores 52 in head-to-heads, third among featured brands. Appears in four comparison queries but never surfaces in discovery-stage shortlists, indicating narrow visibility outside shift-scheduling use cases.

Read brand profile →

Upland Panviva

Scored 0 in all four comparison queries, the worst performance in the evaluation set. Either AI models find no relevant differentiation or the brand lacks citation-worthy documentation in resource-planning contexts.

Read brand profile →

FAQ

Resource Planning questions, answered

What is the best resource planning software?+

AI models cite no dominant tool across 17 discovery prompts — the category has a 0% shortlist coverage rate. Oracle Sales Performance Management leads evaluation scores at 63, but never appears in 'best of' lists, indicating it surfaces only when buyers already know the name.

How does Awork compare to other resource planning tools?+

Awork scores 40 in head-to-head evaluations, above the 33 median, and shows a +6 delta as the only rising brand in recent audits. It holds third place among featured brands with evaluation data, behind Oracle Sales Performance Management (63) and ahead of ScheduleFlex (52).

Which resource planning tools does AI recommend most often?+

None consistently. The shortlist data shows zero dominant brands and a 0% coverage rate across 17 prompts. With 39 brands tracked and an average score of 54.75, the category is highly fragmented — no single vendor owns mindshare in AI-generated recommendations.

Is Oracle Sales Performance Management worth considering for resource planning?+

It scores 63 in comparisons, the highest evaluation score in the category, but appears in zero shortlists. AI cites it only in direct brand-versus-brand queries, not in open-ended 'what should I use' scenarios — classic enterprise-incumbent citation behavior.

Why does Upland Panviva score so low in AI citations?+

Upland Panviva scored 0 across all four comparison queries, the worst in the evaluation dataset. Either AI models find no relevant differentiation in resource-planning contexts or the brand lacks citation-worthy technical documentation indexed by LLMs.

Are resource planning tools trending up in AI citations?+

Too few audits to establish a trend. The data spans two months (March and April 2026) with sample sizes of 4 and 9 prompts. Average scores rose from 51 to 55, but the limited time window makes this noise, not signal.

More in Project Management

Project Management Software Task Management OKRs

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Resource Planning?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Resource Planning leaderboard →