Subcategory · AI Citation Index

LLM Platforms

The LLM platforms category reflects a maturing infrastructure layer where orchestration frameworks (LangChain at 51% shortlist rate, LlamaIndex at 39%) compete alongside data platforms (Databricks), vector databases (Weaviate at 43%), and safety tooling (GuardRails at 39%). The 30-51% shortlist range suggests buyers are actively comparing solutions rather than defaulting to single vendors. Databricks' unique model_diversity score of 5 versus the 4s across other leaders hints at broader enterprise use cases spanning data engineering and AI workloads, while the specialized tools cluster tightly in buyer consideration.

187 discovery queries · 286 head-to-heads · refreshed Jul 13, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 187 buyer-style "LLM Platforms" queries

7%15%23%31%40%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces50%62%73%84%95%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for LLM Platforms sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Weaviate
9/11
2LangChain
9/11
3LlamaIndex
9/11
4Handoff
9/11
5Base
7/11
1Jasper
7/8
2Writer
6/8
3Copy
6/8
4Claude
5/8
5GuardRails
5/8
1GuardRails
5/8
2LangChain
4/8
3LlamaIndex
4/8
4Conversion
3/8
5Base
3/8
1Azure OpenAI Service
7/7
2LangSmith
7/7
3LangChain
7/7
4Databricks
6/7
5Base
5/7
1Hugging Face
7/7
2Llama
7/7
3Microsoft
5/7
4Databricks
5/7
5Base
5/7
1Base
6/6
2LangChain
5/6
3Weaviate
5/6
4Databricks
5/6
5LlamaIndex
4/6
1Conversion
6/6
2Jasper
5/6
3Copy
5/6
4Claude
5/6
5Adobe
4/6
1Jasper
5/5
2Copy
5/5
3Writer
5/5
4Glean
2/5
5Adobe
2/5
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · llm-platforms

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 9/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand09172634Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 9/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Want to know if AI cites your brand for LLM Platforms?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full LLM Platforms leaderboard →