AEO Audit is a free tool that scores B2B SaaS websites for AI search visibility — how likely they are to be cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews when B2B buyers search.

What is AI Engine Optimization (AEO)?

AI Engine Optimization (AEO) is the practice of structuring content, entity signals, and technical infrastructure so that AI engines cite your brand in generated answers. It extends traditional SEO to cover ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews.

Yes. AEO Audit is free. Enter any B2B SaaS brand and receive a full AI visibility score with prioritised recommendations.

How does AEO Audit score websites?

AEO Audit scores across six pillars: AI Visibility (22%), Brand Authority (23%), Content Quality (18%), Platform Optimization (15%), Structured Data (12%), and Technical AEO (10%). Each pillar reflects specific signals that AI engines use when deciding which sources to cite.

Category · AI Citation Index

Who AI is citing in AI & Automation

No single vendor owns AI discovery in automation: 63 brands tracked, zero shortlist dominance, fragmented 62-point avg.

Brands tracked

Avg AEO score

62/100

Citation coverage

of brands cited at least once

Dominant brands

cited > 50% of queries

Discovery stage

The shortlist

When buyers ask AI for the best AI & Automation software

No discovery-stage prompts have been scored against this category yet — once the shortlist cron runs, this section will surface which brands AI cites most.

Evaluation stage

The battleground

How brands fare on comparison queries · category median 40/100

Zapier leads head-to-head comparisons with a 76 average evaluation score across 4 queries, 36 points above the category median of 40. Relay.app (52), Workato (51), Activepieces (47), and Capacity (45) cluster in the middle tier. Jasper, Automationanywhere, and Aisera all tie at 44, showing no differentiation in side-by-side evaluations.

Each brand's evaluation score averages how AI responds to head-to-head comparison queries that mention them. Above-median brands win their comparisons more often than they lose.

Trends

Over the last 12 months

Too few audits to establish a trend: only March 2026 (25 prompts, 59 avg score) and April 2026 (57 prompts, 63 avg score) available. Workato rose 15 points month-over-month; Cognigy dropped 6.

Biggest gain

Workato

+15 pts

Biggest drop

Cognigy

-6 pts

Editorial picks

Brands worth watching

Workato

Tied for highest featured score at 78 and posted the sharpest month-over-month gain (+15 points). LLMs cite Workato when enterprise integration depth matters, yet its evaluation average is only 51—suggesting discovery strength without comparison differentiation.

Read brand profile →

Zapier

Dominates evaluation queries with a 76 average across 4 head-to-heads, 24 points above Workato and 36 above the category median. Featured score of 72 confirms consistent citation, though it does not appear in the top shortlist tier.

Read brand profile →

Uipath

Reached a 72 featured score despite no appearance in the top-8 evaluation leaderboard. LLMs cite UiPath in RPA contexts but rarely pit it against workflow or agent tools in direct comparisons.

Read brand profile →

N8n

Featured score of 71 places it ahead of Make (68) in the open-source / self-hosted automation segment. No evaluation data available, indicating LLMs surface n8n in discovery but users do not prompt brand-versus-brand comparisons.

Read brand profile →

Azure Blob Storage

Highest featured score at 78—an outlier. LLMs cite Azure Blob Storage when automation workflows touch cloud storage or data pipelines, even though it is not an automation platform. Reveals category boundary ambiguity in AI reasoning.

Read brand profile →

Drill down

Subcategories

Workflow Automation Robotic Process Automation AI Agents LLM Platforms AI Chatbots

FAQ

AI & Automation questions, answered

Which automation platform does AI recommend most often?+

No single winner: shortlist coverage is 0% across 38 discovery prompts. Azure Blob Storage and Workato tie at 78 featured score, followed by Zapier, UiPath, and Boomi at 72. LLM citations fragment by subcategory—workflow tools, RPA, and AI agents each surface different brands.

How does Zapier compare to other automation tools in AI citations?+

Zapier scores 76 in head-to-head evaluation queries, the highest in the category and 36 points above the median of 40. Relay.app (52) and Workato (51) trail by 24–25 points. Zapier appears in only 4 comparison queries, so sample size is narrow.

What is the best workflow automation software according to AI?+

AI offers no consensus. 63 brands tracked; zero reached dominant shortlist status. Workato and Zapier both score 72 in featured citations, with n8n (71) and Make (68) close behind. The category average is 62, indicating most tools cluster in a midrange citation band.

Are any automation vendors gaining momentum in AI recommendations?+

Workato rose 15 points month-over-month (March to April 2026), the largest delta in the category. Cognigy fell 6 points. Only two months of trend data exist, so long-term momentum is not yet observable.

Why does Azure Blob Storage appear in automation AI citations?+

LLMs cite Azure Blob Storage (78 featured score) when automation workflows involve cloud storage or data pipelines, even though it is not an automation platform. This reflects category-boundary ambiguity: AI conflates infrastructure components with orchestration tools in certain prompts.

Which RPA tools does AI cite most?+

UiPath (72 featured score) and Automationanywhere (71 featured, 44 evaluation average) lead RPA citations. UiPath does not appear in the top-8 evaluation leaderboard, suggesting LLMs surface it in discovery but users do not prompt direct comparisons. Automationanywhere appeared in 5 evaluation queries with a middling 44 score.

Want to know if AI cites your brand for AI & Automation?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full AI & Automation leaderboard →