Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Robotic Process Automation

Uipath dominates RPA shortlists at 81% while evaluation scores collapse from 69 in April to 17 in June.

165 discovery queries · 140 head-to-heads · refreshed Jul 24, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 165 buyer-style "Robotic Process Automation" queries

Uipath appears in 133 of 165 prompts (81% shortlist rate) with 607 total mentions across all four major models, triple the reach of Microsoft Power Automate at 62%. The middle tier fragments hard: usestable.com (19%), Appian (18%), and sapstore.com (15%) cluster without clear differentiation, while 22 brands achieve consensus status across the 165-prompt test set.

0%25%50%75%100%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces14%34%55%76%96%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Robotic Process Automation sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Uipath
10/10
2Microsoft
10/10
3
Robocorp
7/10
4Automationanywhere
4/10
5OpenBots
4/10
1Uipath
10/10
2Microsoft
10/10
3Appian
6/10
4
Robocorp
6/10
5ServiceNow
6/10
1Uipath
10/10
2Microsoft
10/10
3Appian
8/10
4SAP
7/10
5Pega Platform
6/10
1Microsoft
9/9
2Uipath
9/9
3Nintex
4/9
4OpenBots
4/9
5ServiceNow
4/9
1Uipath
8/8
2Microsoft
8/8
3
Robocorp
7/8
4Rocketbot
2/8
5OpenBots
2/8
1Uipath
6/6
2
Robocorp
6/6
3Microsoft
2/6
1Uipath
6/6
2ServiceNow
4/6
3Microsoft
4/6
4Automationanywhere
3/6
5Appian
3/6
1Uipath
5/5
2ServiceNow
3/5
3Nice
3/5
4Infor
2/5
5Stable
2/5
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · robotic-process-automation

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 7/100

Uipath and Microsoft Power Automate tie at 43 average evaluation score across 24 head-to-head queries, 26% above category median of 7. Stable and ServiceNow both score 34 across 19 comparisons, while Appian (18, 10 queries) and Capacity (16, 9 queries) trail despite solid shortlist presence. The gap between shortlist frequency and evaluation performance widens past the top four.

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand06121824Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 7/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Robotic Process Automation?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Robotic Process Automation leaderboard →