Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Robotic Process Automation

Uipath and Microsoft Power Automate dominate RPA shortlists; evaluation scores cluster in the mid-40s across all contenders.

165 discovery queries · 137 head-to-heads · refreshed Jun 5, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 165 buyer-style "Robotic Process Automation" queries

Uipath appears in 81% of shortlists (133 of 165 prompts) and holds a score of 72, while Microsoft Power Automate trails at 62% (103 prompts, score 21). The next tier — usestable.com, Appian, and sapstore.com — each hit fewer than 20% of shortlists, signaling a two-horse race at the top.

0%25%50%75%100%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces14%34%55%76%96%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Robotic Process Automation sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Uipath
10/10
2Microsoft
10/10
3
Robocorp
7/10
4Automationanywhere
4/10
5OpenBots
4/10
1Uipath
10/10
2Microsoft
10/10
3Appian
6/10
4
Robocorp
6/10
5ServiceNow
6/10
1Uipath
10/10
2Microsoft
10/10
3Appian
8/10
4SAP
7/10
5Place
5/10
1Microsoft
9/9
2Uipath
9/9
3Nintex
4/9
4OpenBots
4/9
5ServiceNow
4/9
1Uipath
8/8
2Microsoft
8/8
3
Robocorp
7/8
4OpenBots
2/8
5Stable
1/8
1Uipath
6/6
2
Robocorp
6/6
3Microsoft
2/6
1Uipath
6/6
2ServiceNow
4/6
3Microsoft
4/6
4Automationanywhere
3/6
5Appian
3/6
1Uipath
5/5
2ServiceNow
3/5
3Nice
3/5
4Infor
2/5
5Stable
2/5
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · robotic-process-automation

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 11/100

Uipath and Microsoft Power Automate tie at an average evaluation score of 43 across 24 head-to-head queries each. usestable.com and ServiceNow follow at 34, both evaluated in 19 comparisons. The median evaluation score sits at 11, showing most challengers fail to break even in direct face-offs.

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand06121824Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 11/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Robotic Process Automation?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Robotic Process Automation leaderboard →