Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Vulnerability Management

The Vulnerability Management category reveals a mature market with broad vendor participation (72 consensus brands) yet surprisingly thin documented evaluation criteria (0% prompt coverage). This gap suggests buyers rely heavily on established reputation and feature parity rather than differentiated requirements. The top tier—InsightIDR, Tenable, and Qualys CSAM—cluster tightly at 62-66% shortlist rates with maximum model diversity (5), indicating these platforms meet diverse organizational needs without clear functional separation. The presence of endpoint-focused vendors like CrowdStrike and SentinelOne alongside pure-play VM tools signals category boundary blurring as vulnerability detection migrates into broader security platforms.

180 discovery queries · 331 head-to-heads · refreshed Jun 29, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 180 buyer-style "Vulnerability Management" queries

3%23%42%61%80%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces68%74%80%86%92%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Vulnerability Management sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Rapid7
9/9
2InsightVM
9/9
3Microsoft
9/9
4ServiceNow
9/9
5Tenable.io
9/9
1Tenable
7/7
2Qualys
7/7
3Rapid7
7/7
4Orca Security
7/7
5ServiceNow
7/7
1Snyk
7/7
2Aqua Security
7/7
3GitLab
7/7
4Mend
6/7
5Semgrep
6/7
1Qualys VMDR
7/7
2Tenable Vulnerability Management
7/7
3Rapid7
7/7
4InsightVM
7/7
5Microsoft
7/7
1Tenable
6/6
2Qualys
6/6
3Rapid7
6/6
4ServiceNow
6/6
5Orca Security
5/6
1Tenable
6/6
2Qualys
6/6
3Rapid7
6/6
4Orca Security
6/6
5ServiceNow
6/6
1Tenable
6/6
2Qualys
6/6
3Rapid7
6/6
4Orca Security
6/6
5Snyk
6/6
1Nessus
5/5
2Qualys VMDR
5/5
3Rapid7
5/5
4Tenable
5/5
5Snyk
5/5
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · vulnerability-management

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 7/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand08162432Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 7/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

654 citations captured across Vulnerability Management prompt runs.

Vendor pages

303

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

199

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Vulnerability Management questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Vulnerability Management?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Vulnerability Management leaderboard →