Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Marketing Analytics

Marketing analytics is fragmented at discovery but consolidates around two consensus picks when buyers compare head-to-head. Attribution shows up in 100% of discovery queries on all five engines — the widest AI footprint in the category. Mixpanel trails by a step in discovery share but wins more head-to-head comparisons than it loses, topping evaluation scores at 79. Salesforce is the other consensus pick, surfacing in 76% of discovery queries across every engine and scoring 71 in head-to-head matchups. The rest of the shortlist splinters across four-engine visibility — Looker, Customer.io, Supermetrics, Segment — but none have evaluation data to confirm whether they win or lose when buyers compare them directly. This is a category with two consensus picks at the top and a long tail of niche players fighting for single-use-case visibility.

46 discovery queries · 87 head-to-heads · refreshed May 1, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 46 buyer-style "Marketing Analytics" queries

Attribution captures eyeballs across all five engines in every discovery prompt about marketing analytics — 100% shortlist rate, the cleanest sweep in the category. Mixpanel shows up in 93% of those same queries, also visible on every engine. Salesforce lands in 76% of discovery prompts with ubiquitous five-engine presence, while Looker (87% shortlist rate) and Customer.io (67%) surface on four of five engines but miss one. Supermetrics, Segment, and Google Analytics 4 each pull four-engine visibility but appear in fewer than two-thirds of buyer queries, leaving fragile discovery share if one engine changes its rotation.

6%21%35%50%65%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces66%74%82%90%98%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Marketing Analytics sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Mixpanel
9/9
2Attribution
9/9
3Segment
7/9
4Looker
7/9
5Default
7/9
1Attribution
8/8
2Looker
8/8
3Mixpanel
8/8
4Salesforce
7/8
5Supermetrics
6/8
1HubSpot
8/8
2Attribution
8/8
3Dashboard
8/8
4Plan
8/8
5Paid
8/8
1Adobe
7/7
2Attribution
7/7
3Salesforce
7/7
4Channels
7/7
5Insights
7/7
1Klaviyo
6/6
2Attribution
6/6
3Semrush
5/6
4Mailchimp
5/6
5Mixpanel
5/6
1Attribution
6/6
2Salesforce
6/6
3Mixpanel
6/6
4Looker
6/6
5Default
6/6
1Salesforce
5/5
2Attribution
5/5
3Mixpanel
5/5
4Looker
5/5
5Segment
4/5
1Attribution
5/5
2Supermetrics
4/5
3Fathom
4/5
4Default
4/5
5Mixpanel
4/5
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · marketing-analytics

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 59/100

Mixpanel wins more head-to-heads than it loses, averaging 79 across seven comparison queries — the highest evaluation score in the category. Microsoft Clarity scores 76 across ten matchups, pulling the kingmaker role with high volume of head-to-head fights. Salesforce scores 71 across four comparisons, winning most of its brackets. Sprinklr Marketing, Localiq, Heap, and Semrush all lose more head-to-heads than they win, scoring below the 59-point median despite appearing in ten or more comparison queries each.

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand036811Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 59/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

708 citations captured across Marketing Analytics prompt runs.

Vendor pages

361

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

178

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Marketing Analytics questions

Every query in the audit set is top-of-funnel exploration — buyers ask AI for the best marketing analytics tools by team size or org scale. Sample phrasings include 'best marketing analytics options for a small team of 8', 'top marketing analytics software for a 30-person marketing team', and 'leading marketing analytics platform for large organizations'. The category has zero head-to-head comparison prompts, zero trust-stage questions about pricing or case studies, and zero conversion-funnel queries about trials or onboarding. All AI attention flows through discovery-stage shortlist fights.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Marketing Analytics?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Marketing Analytics leaderboard →