Subcategory · AI Citation Index
Who AI is citing in Meeting Tools
AI citations favor scheduling tools like Calendly and Azure Blob Storage over traditional meeting platforms; no brand appears in more than 10% of shortlists.
Brands tracked
37
Avg AEO score
66/100
Citation coverage
0%
of brands cited at least once
Dominant brands
0
cited > 50% of queries
Discovery stage
The shortlist
When buyers ask AI for the best Meeting Tools software
No discovery-stage prompts have been scored against this category yet — once the shortlist cron runs, this section will surface which brands AI cites most.
Evaluation stage
The battleground
How brands fare on comparison queries · category median 39/100
On head-to-head comparisons, Calendly leads with a 68 average evaluation score across 4 queries, followed by Zoom Contact Center at 49. The median evaluation score sits at 39, well below the category average of 65.6. Azure Blob Storage—a cloud object storage service—appears in evaluation queries with a 39 score, signaling possible category contamination or edge-case use in meeting recording workflows.
Each brand's evaluation score averages how AI responds to head-to-head comparison queries that mention them. Above-median brands win their comparisons more often than they lose.
Trends
Over the last 12 months
Too few audits to establish a trend. Only two months of data exist (March and April 2026), showing average scores rising from 60 to 66. Zoom Contact Center posted a +16 delta, the fastest gain in the window; Butter fell -12.
Editorial picks
Brands worth watching
Azure Blob Storage
A cloud storage product scoring 78 in a meeting-tools category reveals AI model confusion or recognition of its role in storing meeting recordings. Its 39 evaluation score suggests it's cited for infrastructure, not scheduling or conferencing.
Read brand profile →Calendly
The highest evaluation performer at 68 and a 72 featured-candidate score. Calendly consistently wins head-to-head queries despite zero shortlist dominance, indicating AI models cite it when users ask for specific scheduling comparisons.
Read brand profile →Zoom Contact Center
Rose 16 points between March and April 2026, the sharpest climb in the category. Its 49 evaluation score places it second, though still below the 65.6 category average, and it earned a 62 featured-candidate score.
Read brand profile →Webex
A legacy video brand scoring 71 as a featured candidate but only 40 in evaluations (below the 39 median). AI cites it often in generic contexts but struggles to recommend it in comparative queries.
Read brand profile →FAQ
Meeting Tools questions, answered
What is the best meeting scheduling software?+
Which meeting tool is gaining traction in AI recommendations?+
Why does Azure Blob Storage appear in meeting-tools data?+
How fragmented is the meeting-tools category in AI citations?+
Which meeting tool is losing ground in AI recommendations?+
What's the average AI citation score for meeting tools?+
Related
More in Collaboration
Want to know if AI cites your brand for Meeting Tools?
Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.
Run an audit →